Legal Opinion

Scheer v. Weis

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1961PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

1. Plaintiffs claim that the Bond lot could not be divided into two sites. The zoning ordinance of the village defines “lot” as follows :

“A lot is a parcel of land in single ownership occupied or designed to be occupied by one building and the accessory buildings or uses customarily incident to it, including such open spaces as are required by this code and such open spaces as are arranged and designed to be used in connection with such building.” (Sec. 14.02(19).)

Plaintiff makes two arguments based on this definition. He points out correctly that the Bond lot as previously used fitted the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mueller v. Novelty Dye WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Diehl v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Shapero v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Mason v. RosewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Golden Sands Dairy LLC v. Town of SaratogaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Bloomquist v. Better Business BureauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API