Legal Opinion

Sensenbrenner v. Keppler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaiRchild, J.

1. Timeliness of application. In 1865, this court held that where a judgment debtor was prejudiced by an irregularity in the conduct of a sale on execu tion, the debtor’s remedy was to apply within a reasonable time and have the sale set aside.

In 1867, the court said:

“Undoubtedly a reasonable time must be some time within the period fixed by the law for a redemption. If that period is allowed to expire, and a deed to be executed, the application cannot afterwards be made, unless under special circumstances of fraud or mistake, showing some reasonable excuse for the delay; and then it must be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Diehl v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Town of Greenfield v. Village of West MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Korleski v. Estate of KorleskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Schultz v. KuerschnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Foster v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prn Associates LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of AdministrationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Honeycrest Farms, Inc. v. A.O. Smith Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  3. Varco-Pruden Div. AMCA International Corp. v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API