Legal Opinion
Sensenbrenner v. Keppler
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFaiRchild, J.
1. Timeliness of application. In 1865, this court held that where a judgment debtor was prejudiced by an irregularity in the conduct of a sale on execu tion, the debtor’s remedy was to apply within a reasonable time and have the sale set aside.
In 1867, the court said:
“Undoubtedly a reasonable time must be some time within the period fixed by the law for a redemption. If that period is allowed to expire, and a deed to be executed, the application cannot afterwards be made, unless under special circumstances of fraud or mistake, showing some reasonable excuse for the delay; and then it must be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Diehl v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Town of Greenfield v. Village of West MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Korleski v. Estate of KorleskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Schultz v. KuerschnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Foster v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Prn Associates LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of AdministrationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Honeycrest Farms, Inc. v. A.O. Smith Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Varco-Pruden Div. AMCA International Corp. v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989