Legal Opinion

Cronkite v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 1, 2013No. S12G1927PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melton, Justice.

In connection with his DUI prosecution, Weston D. Cronkite filed a motion under the Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without the State, former OCGA § 24-10-94,1 to obtain, through the testimony of an out-of-state witness, the source code for the Intoxilyzer 5000, the device that was used to test his breath at the *477time that he was pulled over.2 The trial court denied the motion, finding that the evidence was not material, and, on interlocutory appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed, concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion. See Cronkite…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davenport v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  2. State v. BastosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. Cronkite v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  2. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API