Legal Opinion

Cronkite v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 2012No. A12A0671PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Boggs, Judge.

We granted this application for interlocutory appeal to consider the trial court’s denial of defendant Weston D. Cronkite’s motion for a certificate of need for testimony under OCGA § 24-10-90 et seq., The Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without the State (“the Act”). Cronkite sought to obtain, among other things, the “source code” or human-readable programming instructions for the Intoxilyzer 5000, by means of the testimony of a representative of the Kentucky manufacturer. The trial court concluded that such evidence was not “material” within the meaning…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Layfield v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  2. Davenport v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  3. Yeary v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cronkite v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Spann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Teresa Spann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Tracy Renee Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API