Cronkite v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Boggs, Judge.
We granted this application for interlocutory appeal to consider the trial court’s denial of defendant Weston D. Cronkite’s motion for a certificate of need for testimony under OCGA § 24-10-90 et seq., The Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without the State (“the Act”). Cronkite sought to obtain, among other things, the “source code” or human-readable programming instructions for the Intoxilyzer 5000, by means of the testimony of a representative of the Kentucky manufacturer. The trial court concluded that such evidence was not “material” within the meaning…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Layfield v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Davenport v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Yeary v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cronkite v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Spann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Teresa Spann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Tracy Renee Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020