Smith v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Presiding Judge.
Following a bench trial, Jason Smith appeals from his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol with an unlawful blood alcohol concentration (“DUI per se”) in violation of OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (5). Smith contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the finding of guilt; (2) the printed Intoxilyzer 5000 test results were inadmissible under OCGA § 40-6-392 (a) (1) (B); (3) the State unlawfully failed to disclose the computer “source code” of the Intoxilyzer 5000; (4) the trial court erroneously denied his motion for a continuance pending the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Short v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Alethea Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Meredith Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Roger Canelas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.