Legal Opinion
Young v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 4, 2013No. A13A0995; A13A0996; A13A1170; A13A1171; A13A1172; A13A1173; A13A1773; A13A1774; A13A1775; A13A1776PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Branch, Judge.
In each of these ten DUI cases, we granted interlocutory review of the trial court’s consolidated decision to deny the defendants’ similar motions to determine the relevance and materiality of the source code1 of the Intoxilyzer 5000 in connection with the defendants’ attempt to secure production of that proprietary source code from CMI, Inc., the machine’s manufacturer, in Kentucky. We affirm.
Each appellant before us was arrested in Athens-Clarke County for driving under the influence of alcohol and was given an alcohol breath test on an Intoxilyzer 5000. Based on the results…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Max BudziakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Minder v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Davenport v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Marr v. Georgia Department of EducationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Rodgers v. First Union Nat. Bank of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Aburto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Davenport v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Camela Noelle Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Eduardo Bowman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.