Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Lindenstruth

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 14, 1894PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the 'Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, J.

On August the twentieth, eighteen hundred and ninety, Lindenstruth borrowed five thousand and five hundred dollars in cash from The George Bauernschmidt Brewing Company of Baltimore, and at the . same time, and to secure the repayment of the loan, executed and delivered to the lender a mortgage conveying both real and personal property, and likewise all of the mortgagor’s “ stock in trade, such as whiskies, brandies, -wines, liquors of any sort and description.” Amongst other things, the mortgage contained the following'provision: “And it is hereby expressly understood that all stock and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  2. Cheatham v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  3. Fisher v. SyfersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Butler v. RahmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  5. Fulton v. MaccrackenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Edelhoff & Rinke v. Horner-Miller Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  2. Baltimore Humane Impartial Society & Aged Women's & Aged Men's Homes v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  3. Grimes v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
  4. Farm & Cattle Loan Co. v. FaulknerWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  5. In re SachsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API