Legal Opinion
Emi Group North America, Inc. v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 21, 2001No. 00-1508PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
After a jury verdict, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware denied EMI Group North America, Inc.’s motion for a new trial. EMI Group N. Am., Inc. v. Cypress Semiconductor Corp., 104 F.Supp.2d 370 (D.Del.2000). Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the jury verdicts were consistent, this court affirms.
EMI also sought a judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) that United States Patent Nos. 4,826,785 (the '785 patent) and 4,935,-801 (the '801 patent) are not invalid. The district court denied the motion in part.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Parker v. FlookSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Continental Can Company Usa, Inc. And Continental Pet Technologies, Inc. v. Monsanto Company, Hoover Universal, Inc. And Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Moleculon Research Corporation v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Atlas Powder Company v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company and Alamo Explosives Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. And Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Doing Business as Labcorp)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Chemque, Inc. (Formerly Known as Chemque Canada, Ltd.) and Thomas & Betts Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Innogenetics, N v. v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, and Hyosung Corporation and Hyosung (America), Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Dystar Textilfarben Gmbh & Co Deutschland Kg v. C.H. Patrick, Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.