Legal Opinion

State v. Towe

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 14, 2012No. 121PA11PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUNDS, Justice.

In this case, we consider whether the Court of Appeals correctly held that the trial court committed plain error when it admitted conclusory expert testimony on whether the juvenile victim had been sexually abused. The Court of Appeals found plain error and reversed defendant’s convictions, concluding that “it [was] highly plausible that the jury could have reached a different result” absent the expert testimony. State v. Towe, — N.C. App. —, —, 707 S.E.2d 770, 775 (2011). Although we hold that admission of the testimony was plain *57error, the plain error standard requires a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. HammettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Maconeghy Jr., K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  3. State v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API