Legal Opinion

Acacia Villa v. Kemp

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 31, 1990No. CV 90-390 MRPPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

PFAELZER, District Judge.

The Court having read and considered all the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the plaintiffs’ motions for partial summary judgment and defendants’ motion for summary judgment has concluded that:

I. Background

Plaintiffs are private developers who, between 1974 and 1988, entered into long term contracts with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) to provide low-income rental housing. These contracts, known as Housing Assistance Payments (“HAP”) contracts, were entered into pursuant to Section 8 of the Housing Act of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Leased Housing Association, and 189 Named v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Patrick Media Group, Inc. v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Alpine Ridge Group v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Villa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Alpine Ridge Group, a Partnership Monroe Associates, a Limited Partnership Brentwood, a Limited Partnership Campbell Courts Associates, a Partnership Cheney Gardens Limited Partnership, a Limited Partnership, and Bitterroot Manor, a Limited Partnership, Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. Jack F. Kemp, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Urban Development U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Alpine Ridge Group, a Partnership Monroe Associates, a Limited Partnership Brentwood, a Limited Partnership Campbell Courts Associates, a Partnership Cheney Gardens Limited Partnership, a Limited Partnership v. Jack F. Kemp, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Urban Development U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Acacia Villa Alicia Park Apartments Amerige Villa Antelope Valley v. Jack Kemp, Sec. Hud, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API