Wilms v. New Hampshire Fire Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw; Gage, J. Assumpsit by William Wilms against the New Hampshire Fire Insurance Company upon three policies of insurance. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict. Defendánt brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
The action is brought to recover upon three policies of insurance, issued by defendant to the Northern Timber Company, covering lumber claimed to have been destroyed by fire June 17, 1913. *658They, with other policies covering the same risk, and which have been'paid, were assigned, before loss, to the plaintiff. At the circuit, a verdict for plaintiff was directed by the court, .upon which a judgment for the sum of $4,991.70 was entered November 18, 1915. A new trial, asked for by defendant, was refused.
The policies describe the insured property:
“On lumber (lath and shingles, if any) owned by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Popa v. Northern InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Richards v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Briggs v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Lancashire Ins. Co. of Manchester v. BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Fisk v. Fire Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Ætna Insurance v. MoselyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Alma State Savings Bank v. Springfield Fire & Marine Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. CullinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Commonwealth Insurance v. SolomanSuperior Court of Delaware · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.