Ætna Insurance v. Mosely
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.
The action was on a fire-insurance policy covering a certain dwelling house in the sum of $8000, and household goods in the sum of $1000, alleged to have been destroyed by fire. The policy contained what is known as a loss-payable clause or rider, in favor of A. C. Ingle as his interest might appear. Inventories showing the cost of the building and of the household goods destroyed were attached as exhibits. Petitioner further alleged that he furnished to the general adjuster of the company, John F. Hall-man, who was investigating the fire and undertaking in behalf of the company to adjust the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Carroll v. Girard Fire Insurance of the City of PhiladelphiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Insurance Co. of North America v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Sun Insurance Office v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance v. CumbaaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- New York Underwriters Insurance v. NolesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Sentinel Fire Insurance v. McRobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Johnson v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SampleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.