Fisk v. Fire Ass'n
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Sanilac; Beach, J. Assumpsit by Charles Fisk against the Fire Association of Philadelphia, a foreign corporation, on a fire insurance policy. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Person, J..This action is upon a policy of fire insurance and in the circuit court plaintiff recovered a judgment for $1,000 and interest. The errors alleged by defendant on appeal are not numerous, and, of those argued, such as relate to the language used by plaintiff’s, counsel in the examination of witnesses, and before the jury, cannot be considered, because not covered by proper assignments.
It is conceded that the policy was in force when the fire occurred; the destruction of the property insured, or of a large portion of it, is not denied, and there is no question raised as to the value…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Popa v. Northern InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Morgan v. Illinois InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. Yorkshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Fisk v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Gambino v. Northern Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Wilms v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Fenton v. National Fire Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.