Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Cullin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 23, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the.Court-by

Judge McCandless

Affirming.

This appeal involves the validity of a parol contract of fire insurance upon which the appellee recovered a judgment of $7,900.00 in the court below.

It is conceded that such a contract is valid when made by an authorized agent, provided it embraces the following essential elements: (a) subject matter, (b) amount of insurance, (c) rate, (d) duration, and if the agent represents more than one company, (e) the name of the company or companies, and the amount of risk placed with each. This is in accord with our decisions. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Henderson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. United States v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Cleaver v. Traders' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Pratt v. . D.H.M.F. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Preferred Risk Fire Ins. Co. v. NeetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  2. Kentucky Utilities Co. v. City of ParisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. RobeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Middlesboro-LaFollette Bus Line, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  5. Hensley v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API