Legal Opinion

Native Village of Tununak v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 2014No. 6954 S-14670PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOWERS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is the second appeal in a case that began in July 2008 when the Alaska Office of Children's Services (OCS) assumed custody of four-month-old Dawn 1 from her parents.2 Dawn was found to be a child in need of aid (CINA).3 Dawn's parents were Alaska Natives and thus the protections and requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) 4 applied to the CINA case.5 One of ICWA's provisions establishes preferences for foster care and adoptive placement of an Indian child with a member of the child's extended family, with other members of the child's tribe, or…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Hutto v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brackeen v. HaalandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  2. Gila River Indian Community v. Department of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  3. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCS v. Zander B & Kelly B. (Foster Parents)Alaska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Yvonne Ito v. Copper River Native AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Taryn M. v. State of Alaska, Department of Family & Community Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API