Legal Opinion

Thissen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1991No. 1454 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARBIERI, Senior Judge.

Henry W. Thissen, Jr. (Claimant) seeks review of the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) insofar as it reversed the referee’s award of counsel fees in favor of Claimant and against Hall’s Motor Transit (Employer) pursuant to Section 440 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, added by Section 3 of the Act of February 8, 1972, P.L. 25, 77 P.S. § 996. 1 The sole issue presented for our consideration on review is whether the Board erred in reversing the referee’s finding of an unreasonable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. MacNeill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Cleaver v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Landis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Jodon v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Coyne v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. McGuire v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Nortim, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Frankford Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Hansen v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API