City of Bartlesville v. Holm
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Washington County; R. H. Hudson, Judge. Suit by H. J. Holm and others against the City of Bartlesville and others to enjoin collection of special assessment. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was a suit in equity, commenced by the defendants in error, plaintiffs below, against the plaintiffs in error, defendants below, to enjoin the collection of a certain special assessment for street paving purposes, levied against the property of the plaintiffs in the city of Bartlesville. Upon trial to the court, the relief prayed for was granted, to reverse which action this proceeding in error was commenced.
The specific ground of complaint on the part of the property owners is that the mayor and council of the city did not take the necessary steps, or do the things necessary, to confer…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- McCoy v. AbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Shepard v. BarronSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Bissell v. CouchaineOhio Supreme Court · 1846
- Board of Commissioners v. PlotnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Weinberger v. Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Abell v. Town of BoyntonSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Lamasco Realty Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Chickasha v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- City of Muskogee v. RamboSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.