Legal Opinion

Grinstead v. Feinstein

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 12, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Commissioner Hobson—

Beversing.

Mrs. W. P. Grinstead brought this action against Ben Feinstein and Ms son, Paul Feinstein, to recover for injuries received in an automobile collision. The proof for her, briefly stated, showed these facts: She was riding in a Ford sedan with three other ladies, going from Corbin to Barbourville. She was on the back seat, and they were going about 25 miles an hour. Ben Feinstein came up behind them in a large Dodge car and undertook to pass them. The first they knew of his presence was as his ear came up beside them; the Ford sedan was on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Black Diamond Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. Armstrong's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Collett's Guardian v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Ham v. HordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spencer's Administrator v. FiselCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Cornett's Administrator v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. Longley & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Pearson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API