Legal Opinion
Spencer's Administrator v. Fisel
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided February 27, 1934PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Richardson
Affirming.
The correctness of the trial court .directing a verdict for the defendant, is the paramount question. The propriety of its giving necessarily depends on the evidence adduced.
This action was filed by the administrator of Selden Spencer to recover of J. C. Fisel, damages for the destruction of his decedent’s power to earn money. By appropriate pleadings issues were joined, and, after the jury heard the parties and their witnesses, the peremptory instruction was given, of which the administrator ..now complains.
About 11 o’clock on the night of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- American Savings Life Insurance v. RiplingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Globe Indemnity Company v. DaviessCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Dossenbach v. Reidhar's Ex'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Mullen & Haynes Co. v. CrispCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. CashCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Huber & Huber Motor Express v. Martin's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Hopper v. Barren Fork Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Consolidated Coach Corp. v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Higgans v. DeskinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
- Gregg v. De ShongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.