Legal Opinion

North Brook Farm Lines, Inc. v. McBrayer

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 17, 1978No. 7727DC145PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Although Judge Phillips classified the four statements to which plaintiff takes exception as findings of fact, they are in fact conclusions of law and for purposes of appellate review will be treated as such. “A conclusion or inference of law by the lower court is reviewable, even though the lower court denominates it a *38finding of fact.” 1 Strong’s N.C. Index, Appeal and Error § 57.3, p. 345. See Roberts v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company, 256 N.C. 434, 124 S.E. 2d 105 (1962).

Plaintiff contends first that the trial court erred in concluding as a matter of law that a default judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Chadbourn, Inc. v. KatzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Roberts v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Asheville, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. COASTAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. FallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Thompson v. Santiago, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API