North Brook Farm Lines, Inc. v. McBrayer
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Although Judge Phillips classified the four statements to which plaintiff takes exception as findings of fact, they are in fact conclusions of law and for purposes of appellate review will be treated as such. “A conclusion or inference of law by the lower court is reviewable, even though the lower court denominates it a *38finding of fact.” 1 Strong’s N.C. Index, Appeal and Error § 57.3, p. 345. See Roberts v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company, 256 N.C. 434, 124 S.E. 2d 105 (1962).
Plaintiff contends first that the trial court erred in concluding as a matter of law that a default judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Chadbourn, Inc. v. KatzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Roberts v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Asheville, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
3Cited by2 opinions
- COASTAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. FallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Thompson v. Santiago, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County2001