Legal Opinion

Chadbourn, Inc. v. Katz

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1974No. 42PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

After argument of this case in the Court of Appeals, plaintiff filed a motion to amend its complaint by deleting its claim and prayer for specific performance of the contract. That motion was allowed. Moreover, plaintiff states in its brief that the proceedings by Chadbourn against the codefendant Brevard Realty Company, Inc. are not involved in this appeal. Accordingly, this suit now involves only the $135,000.00 damages claimed by plaintiff for breach of contract by defendant Katz.

The sole question posed for decision is whether the trial court acquired personal jurisdiction…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Tom Togs, Inc. v. Ben Elias Industries Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Johnston County v. R. N. Rouse & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Skinner v. Preferred CreditSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  5. United Buying Group, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API