Legal Opinion
State v. Jim
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 10, 1986No. CR 82-315; CA A33716PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*179BUTTLER, P. J.
Defendant was convicted of the sale of food fish during a closed commercial season, in violation of ORS 509.011, which makes it “unlawful to: [b]uy, receive, possess or sell food fish unlawfully caught during a closed season.” ORS 509.011(2)(a). Defendant, a member of the Yakima Indian Nation, admits that, on April 28,1982, he caught salmon from the Columbia River, which he later sold at Celilo Indian Village to an undercover special agent for the National Marine Fisheries Service, and that, on that date, the commercial fishing season was closed.
The fish were caught pursuant to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Antoine v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. JohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PelicanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- North Pacific Insurance v. SwitzlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Columbia Riverkeeper v. ODFWCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- State v. McCormack/SenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.