Legal Opinion

State v. Jim

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 9, 2002No. CR 99-089; A107059PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant, a member of the Yakima Indian Nation, challenges the authority of the state to prosecute him for driving offenses committed on a public road in Celilo Indian Village, an area of Wasco County that is held in trust by the federal government for three different tribes. Defendant demurred to the charges, arguing that Celilo Indian Village should be regarded as part of the Warm Springs Reservation, an area over which the state lacks criminal jurisdiction. The trial court held that, although Celilo Indian Village is held in trust for several tribes, it is part of no particular…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. JohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. WattersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API