Dunlap v. Montana-Tonopah Mining Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada
At Law. Action by R. P. Dunlap against the Montana-Tonomh Mining Company. On motion for new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
FARRINGTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action to recover the sum of $20,500, a balance alleged to be due for services rendered between January 15, 1903, and February 15, 1910. Plaintiff was secretary treasurer of defendant company from January 15, 1903, to October 15, 1903, at a salary of $150 per month; and from the latter date until he resigned, February 21, 1905, at $200 per month. This salary has been fully paid. From September 8, 1903, to February 15, 1910, he was a director, and from September 11, M906, he was also a vice president of said company.
Defendant denies that Dunlap…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Snodgrass v. Branch Bank at DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Brice v. . BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Ten Eyck v. Pontiac, Oxford & Port Austin RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Corinne Mill, Canal & Stock Co. v. ToponceSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Santa Clara Mining Ass'n v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. HebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
- ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWDER COMPANY v. HamlinNevada Supreme Court · 1957
- Truman v. Sutter-Butte Canal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Hjorth Oil Co. v. CurtisWyoming Supreme Court · 1917