Legal Opinion

Truman v. Sutter-Butte Canal Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1926No. Docket No. 2981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant to recover the aggregate sum of $18,000, alleged to he the extent of the damage, measured in money, inflicted upon plaintiff’s orchard by certain acts of the defendant. The issues of fact were tried before a jury, who awarded plaintiff a verdict for the sum of $5,000. Judgment was entered accordingly, and from said judgment defendant appeals.

The defendant is a public service corporation, and owns and operates an irrigation system, “consisting of ditches, dams, pumping plants and other structures,” and serves persons owning lands contiguous to its system with…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tormey v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Hartford Bridge Co. v. GrangerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
  3. North Sterling Irrigation District v. DickmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  4. Kennell v. BoyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Langdon v. AhrendsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. ForsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Kolberg v. Sherwin-Williams Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Massetti v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Hall v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API