Legal Opinion

Hjorth Oil Co. v. Curtis

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1917No. 853PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the District Court, Natrona County; HoN. Charles E. WINTER, Judge. Action by Frank E. Curtis against Hjorth Oil Company, a corporation, to recover compensation for services rendered and expenses incurred in the negotiation of a sale of defendant’s property. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant brings error. The material facts are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Error to the District Court, Natrona County; HoN. Charles E. WINTER, Judge. Action by Frank E. Curtis against Hjorth Oil Company, a corporation, to recover compensation for services rendered and expenses incurred in the negotiation of a sale of defendant’s property. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant brings error. The material facts are stated in the opinion. Plaintiff was not employed as a broker to perform the services for which he seeks a recovery; he was not a broker in fact, but an attorney in the employ of defendant. He was also assistant secretary of the company and a stockholder…

1Opinion of the Court

Potter, Chief Justice.

Frank G. Curtis brought this action against the Hjorth Oil Company, a corporation, to recover the alleged value of his services and expenses in negotiating and making a sale of that company’s leasehold interest in a certain tract of land in Natrona county, this state, upon which the company had drilled a productive oil well, and in procuring from the purchasers an agreement to take the' oil produced by the company upon land owned by it at the market price. Such services and expenses were alleged to be of the reasonable *5value of thirty-five thousand dollars, and it was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Cheeney v. Lafayette, Bloomington & Mississippi Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. National Loan & Investment Co. v. Rockland Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  4. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  5. Holder v. Lafayette, Bloomington & Mississippi Ry. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McDermott v. Ida CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Harsh v. Silver Hill Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API