Legal Opinion
Gryc v. Lewis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 25, 1987No. C9-87-389PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This case involves the construction of a cul-de-sac and the parties’ understanding regarding compensation for property lost as a result of the construction. Marcella and Lyle Lewis appeal from a December 8, 1986 judgment finding them jointly and severally liable to respondent Pamela Gryc, under an implied agreement, for the reasonable value of land used. On appeal, appellants contend that the trial court erred in finding an implied agreement to compensate respondent for property lost as a result of the cul-de-sac. We affirm.
FACTS
Sometime in 1981-82, a number of neighboring…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Holt v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Balafas v. BalafasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Capital Warehouse Co. v. McGill-Warner-Farnham Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- The Grandoe Corporation v. Gander Mountain CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Joseph v. Edeskuty & Associates v. Jacksonville Kraft Paper Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- Krogness v. Best Buy Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.