Legal Opinion

Walz v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1930No. 29,304PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The question in this case is whether the commissioner of compensation may, on his own motion, and without regard to the authority conferred by section 28 of the workmen’s compensation act (Laws 1927, ch. 232), set aside an award duly made, approved and filed, and grant a rehearing of the claim, for compensation.

Walz, an employee of the railway company, sought compensation for an injury, and the matter was heard by an examiner in the city of Atchison on July 23, 1929. On August 1 the examiner made an award denying compensation on the ground…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Norman v. Consolidated Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fleming v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Fougnie v. Wilbert & Schreeb Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. Hormann v. New Hampshire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Willis v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Gray v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API