Legal Opinion

Hormann v. New Hampshire Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 26, 1984No. 56,184, 56,211PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

The plaintiffs in two Sedgwick County cases, consolidated for appeal, attempted to sue their employers’ workers’ compensation insurers for tortious behavior in termi nating the injured workers’ benefits without just cause. Hormann is here on interlocutory appeal following the district court judge’s denial of insurers’ motion to dismiss for the worker’s failure to state a cause of action. Snyder is here following summary judgment for the insurer in which a different district judge found that the worker’s compensation remedies were exclusive.

T…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Coleman v. American Universal Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Stafford v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. of New York, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Moeser v. ShunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. RuttigerTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Falline v. GNLV CORP.Nevada Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Kindel v. Ferco Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. Cook v. MacK's Transfer & StorageCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API