Legal Opinion

Garrity v. Bagold Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1943PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

This is a motion to strike out various defenses and a counterclaim contained in the defendants’ answer. The plaintiffs’ cause of action is predicated on the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq.), which provides for the recovery of wages for overtime work et cetera.

The first defense pleads an estoppel. It alleges: (a) That the plaintiffs were paid in accordance with their contract, namely, the collective bargaining agreements; (b) that the plaintiffs never claimed their statutory wages for overtime work; (c) that the defendants, relying upon the aforesaid…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Carleton Screw Products Co. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  3. Wilkinson v. Noland Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1941
  4. Emerson v. Mary Lincoln Candies, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Lefevers v. General Export Iron & Metal Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Berry v. 34 Irving Place CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  3. Bailey v. Karolyna Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  4. Greenberg v. Arsenal Bldg. CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  5. Walsh v. 515 Madison Avenue Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API