Legal Opinion

Greenberg v. Arsenal Bldg. Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 12, 1943PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

Plaintiff sues on behalf of himself and twenty-five other employees or former employees of the Arsenal Building, to recover unpaid overtime compensation alleged to be due under Section 7(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 207 (a), for varying periods of employment from October 23, 1938, to February 5, 1942. Plaintiff also seeks to recover under Section 16(b) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b), an additional equal amount as liquidated damages and an attorney’s fee. The defendant, Arsenal Building Corporation, is the owner of the twenty-two story…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Hunt v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hodgson v. Arnheim & Neely, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  2. Berry v. 34 Irving Place CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  3. Shultz v. Arnheim & Neely, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Durkin v. WaldronDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1955
  5. Hodgson v. Arnheim And Neely, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API