Legal Opinion

Mo-Kan Central Recovery Co. v. Hedenkamp

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1984No. WD 34993PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

Appellant Mo-Kan Central Recovery Company (“Mo-Kan”) is in the business of repossessing automobiles and trucks owned by third-party debtors on behalf of its clients who are foreclosing on their security interests. Respondent Carl Heden-kamp formerly was employed by Mo-Kan. Mo-Kan sought to enjoin its former employee’s alleged breach of a restrictive covenant in which Hedenkamp had agreed not to compete with Mo-Kan’s business within a fifty-mile radius of the Kansas City, Missouri city limits for a period of two years following termination of his employment. This appeal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. National Rejectors, Inc. v. TriemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. Continental Research Corp. v. ScholzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Renwood Food Products, Inc. v. SchaeferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Orchard Container Corp. v. OrchardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Healthcare Services of the Ozarks, Inc. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. Baxter International, Inc., Baxter Healthcare Corp., Baxter Diagnostics, Inc. v. Roger J. Morris, Dr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. Schott v. BeussinkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. N.I.S. Corp. v. Hallahan (In Re Hallahan)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1987
  5. AEE-EMF, INC. v. PassmoreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API