Legal Opinion

Schott v. Beussink

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 22, 1997No. 71172PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RHODES RUSSELL, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs are general partners in an accounting firm known as Schott & Company (“employer”). Defendants (“employees”), who are certified public accountants, formerly worked for employer. Employer appeáls the dismissal of its third amended petition alleging breach of contract, civil conspiracy, and interference with contract. The trial court dismissed the petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

During the course of their employment, employees worked under a series of one-year’…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mills v. MurrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Seach v. Richards, Dieterle & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Osage Glass, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. Willman v. BehelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  5. Cady v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Cambridge Engineering, Inc. v. Mercury Partners 90 BI, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. Whelan Security Co. v. KennebrewSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. Envirotech, Inc. v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Executive Board of the Missouri Baptist Convention v. Windermere Baptist Conference CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Systematic Business Services, Inc. v. BrattenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API