Legal Opinion
D'Amico v. Johnson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 22, 1999No. AC 18099PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The plaintiff, Joseph D’Amico, appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court after it granted the defendants’ motion to strike. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that, because the allegations of his complaint are sufficient to state a cause of action -under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the trial court improperly granted the defendants’ motion to strike. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*857The relevant facts are the allegations of the plaintiffs complaint, which follow. The plaintiff is an adult citizen of the United States residing in Windsor. The defendant Debra L. Johnson,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Giaimo v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- In re Michael L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Alterio v. Diaz, No. Cv000375823s (Jul. 13, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
- Bauer v. Colucci, No. Cv99 033 68 86 S (Jan. 30, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
- Carameta v. Allstate Insurance Co., No. Cv00 06 99 43 (Jan. 8, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.