Legal Opinion
Corsello v. Verizon New York, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 2012No. 51PublishedCited by 567 opinions
POINTS OF COUNSEL
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
Defendant Verizon New York, Inc. (Verizon) attached a box to a building that plaintiffs own, and used the box to transmit telephone communications to and from Verizon’s customers in other buildings. Plaintiffs claim that Verizon took their property without paying them just compensation, and deceived them into believing that no compensation was owed.
We hold that plaintiffs have stated a valid “inverse condemnation” claim for just compensation, and that that claim is not time-barred. However, their claim for an alleged violation of General Business Law § 349 is…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. WildensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Small v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- United States v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by567 opinions
- Goldemberg v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- NewSpin Sports, LLC v. Arrow Electronics, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Buonasera v. Honest Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Koenig v. Boulder Brands, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Weisblum v. Prophase Labs, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
562 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.