Legal Opinion

Virginia v. Reinhard

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 2, 2009No. 08-1845PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Senior Judge SILER and Judge CONRAD joined.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

A state agency known as the Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy, or “VOPA,” brought this action in federal court against three Virginia officials in their official capacities. VOPA claims that the defendant state officials are violating federal law and seeks declaratory and injunctive relief. We hold that sovereign immunity bars VOPA’s suit. While Congress could seek to provide a federal forum for this action through its…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lee-Thomas v. Prince George's County Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  2. Indiana Protection & Advocacy Services v. Indiana Family & Social Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Virginia Office for Protection & Advocacy v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Fideicomiso De La Tierra v. FortunoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  5. Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Inc. v. Hobet Mining, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API