Casey v. Mason
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Logan County; before Jno. H. Burford, District Judge. Action by Mack Mason against William Casey and Charles Casey. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Burwell, J.:
The defendant in error, Mack Mason, commenced this action in the district court of Logan county against the plaintiffs in error herein, to recover damages for an alleged trespass upon real estate. The petition, omitting the caption, is in the following language:'
‘■Mack Mason, plaintiff, by Lawrence, Huston & Huston, his attorneys, complains of William Casey and Charles Casey, defendants, and for his cause of action against said defendants alleges that he is now, and has been since the second day of August, 1897, the owner in fee and entitled.to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Edwards v. . NoyesNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Fitzpatrick v. GebhartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Brown v. BridgesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Sullivan v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Gronour v. DanielsIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. McIntireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- State v. StorrsWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- City of Chickasha v. LooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.