Legal Opinion

Valenzuela v. Aquino

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1993No. D-0740PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HECHT, Justice.

Dr. Eduardo Aquino and his family (“Aquino”) sued Elíseo Valenzuela, Jr., and others (“Valenzuela”) for damages resulting from picketing near the Aquino home and for an injunction against continued picketing. Aquino based his action on two theories, negligent infliction of emotional distress and breach of privacy, but at trial before a jury Aquino obtained jury findings on only the first theory. The trial court rendered judgment on the verdict, awarding Aquino damages against Valenzuela and permanently enjoining Valenzuela from picketing within 400 feet of the Aquino…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Billings v. AtkinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  4. St. Elizabeth Hospital v. GarrardTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. Texas Pet Foods, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. Walling v. MetcalfeTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Etan Industries, Inc. v. LehmannTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Webb v. Glenbrook Owners Ass'n, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API