St. Elizabeth Hospital v. Garrard
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RAY, Justice.
The question presented in this personal injury case is whether the physical manifestation requirement remains an element of claims for negligent infliction of mental anguish. The trial court dismissed the plaintiffs’ case because their petition sought recovery for mental anguish damages, negligently inflicted, which were not alleged to have resulted in physical injury. The court of appeals held that this court had previously eliminated the physical manifestation requirement and reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause for trial. 708 S.W.2d 571. We…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Sanchez v. SchindlerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- Portee v. JaffeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Tyler v. LikesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.