Legal Opinion

Etan Industries, Inc. v. Lehmann

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2011No. 10-0318PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Etan Industries, Inc. contends that the tort claims against it are barred by the two-year statute of limitations. It also argues that the declaratory judgment against it was unwarranted. We agree and accordingly reverse and render judgment for Etan.

Etan, a cable television and internet provider, had cable lines running on two properties owned by Ronald and Dana Leh-mann (the Lehmanns). The properties were located on Highways 77 and 290. Etan’s cable lines were placed on poles belonging to Bluebonnet Electric Cooperative, Inc., an electricity provider. Bluebonnet had easements on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., LCTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  4. MBM Financial Corp. v. Woodlands Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Cobb v. HarringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Southwestern Energy Production Co. v. Berry-HelfandTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Valdez v. HollenbeckTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Texas Department of State Health Services v. BalquintaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  4. Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A. v. RPK Capital XVI, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
  5. H.E.B., L.L.C. v. Horace T. Ardinger, Jr. and Westland Capitol Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API