National Labor Relations Board v. Philamon Laboratories, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARSHALL, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board found respondent violated § 8(a) (1), (2) and (5) 1 of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, and now petitions for enforcement of its order pursuant to § 10(e). 2 Having reviewed the record, including that portion which “fairly detracts” from the findings of the Board, we hold the findings are supported by substantial evidence and conclusive upon us. § 10(e); Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474, 488, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). Because the remedy sought is appropriate, we grant the petition.
Respondent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- International Association of MacHinists Tool and Die Makers Lodge No. 35 v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Franks Bros. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. And Winn-Dixie Louisville, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- National Labor Relations Board v. Flomatic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Sakrete of Northern California, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Irving Air Chute Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- National Labor Relations Board v. S & H Grossinger's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.