Legal Opinion

Radella v. Bankers Mutual Fire Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 1949No. Appeal, 160PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

John Radella brought this action in assumpsit against Bankers Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, hereinafter referred to as the Insurer, on a policy issued to Radella covering loss by collision or upset of a tractor and trailer. The Insurer filed an answer to the complaint in which it averred that the equipment was not covered by the policy and that the damage was not caused by collision or upset as defined by the policy. When the case came on for trial the Insurer admitted that the equipment was covered by the policy and defended solely on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Snader v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Sack v. Glens Falls InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pugh v. Bankers Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Espree v. Western Pioneer Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Ferguson v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  4. Dillehay v. Hartford Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Manard Molasses Co. v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API