Legal Opinion
Manard Molasses Co. v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 11, 1965No. 1688PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YARRUT, Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment of the district court denying Plaintiff recovery of $1,800.00 under a Comprehensive Coverage Policy, for the loss of a truck destroyed under facts stipulated by the parties in their respective motions for a Summary Judgment, decided in favor of Defendant.
The provision in the policy that is in dispute provides:
“Coverage A — Comprehensive Loss of or Damage to the Automobile, Except by Collision or Upset: To pay for direct and accidental loss of or damage to the automobile, hereinafter called loss, except loss caused by collision of the automobile…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Albritton v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Harris v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Freiberger v. Globe Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Barnard v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Espree v. Western Pioneer Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Great American Insurance Co. v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Sawyer v. Shelter Insurance CompaniesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- U-Haul Co. of Tex. v. WALKER BOAT YARDLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995