Legal Opinion

Dillehay v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1966No. 9854PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Respondent seeks recovery from appellant of property damage to his 1963 Chevrolet two-ton dump truck covered by an insurance policy- issued by appellant. Under the policy’s coverage relating to “Collision or Upset,” appellant agreed:

“To pay for direct and accidental -loss of or damage to the'automobile, hereinafter called loss, caused' by collision of the automobile with another object or by upset of the automobile, but only for the amount of each such loss in excess of the deductible amount.”

Respondent’s truck was equipped with an ensilage bed of eight-ton capacity, activated…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jack v. Standard Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Carl Ingalls, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Farley v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Heath v. Utah Home Fire Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Espree v. Western Pioneer Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. Argonaut Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Mason v. Commercial Union Assurance CompaniesUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Martin v. Argonaut Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API