People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Busick
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in a condemnation action, and from an order denying appellants’ motion to vacate the judgment on grounds stated in Code of Civil Procedure, section 473. We affirm both judgment and order.
The respondent brought this action to acquire appellants’ property for highway purposes. The land and buildings in question were used as a truck-stop restaurant. At a pretrial conference, Mr. Rinehart, as attorney for respondent, and Mr. Robinson, as appellants’ attorney, signed a stipulation on behalf of their respective clients containing this paragraph: “1. The date set…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Zak v. State Farm Mutual Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Jaffe v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Alferitz v. CahenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. Kings County Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Bird v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Young v. RedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Foster v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Cade v. Mid-City Hospital Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Schnear v. BoldreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Bennett v. UngerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.