Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 23, 1978No. 48176PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

Appeal by defendant from a declaratory judgment entered June 14, 1977, in district court. The court denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment and determined that the plaintiff was an insured for the purposes of uninsured motorist protection under two insurance policies issued by defendant to plaintiff’s stepfather. We affirm.

This case was submitted to the trial court on stipulated facts which may be summarized as follows: Plaintiff was injured on October 21, 1974, while riding as a passenger in an uninsured automobile. She owned an automobile which was insured and which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Farmers Insurance v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Lopez v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Aetna Insurance v. HurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Famuliner v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Rosenberger v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Burgraff v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Safeco Insurance Companies v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API