Legal Opinion
Aetna Insurance v. Hurst
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 23, 1969No. Civ. 33775PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FILES, P. J.
The facts are not in dispute. On September 7, 1965, defendant Walter Hurst, while operating an uninsured two-wheeled motorcycle owned by him, was involved in an accident with an uninsured motorist. Defendant Yolanda Hurst, who is Walter’s wife, owned a Pontiac automobile, which had been insured by plaintiff. The policy included a coverage called “protection against uninsured motorists.” Walter claimed that he sustained injuries caused by the negligence of the uninsured motorist. On that ground he sought indemnification under Yolanda’s policy.
Plaintiff then brought this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gulf American Fire & Casualty Co. v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Mission Insurance v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Hendricks v. Meritplan InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Allstate Insurance Company v. MeeksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
3Cited by28 opinions
- Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Elledge v. WarrenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hinkel Ex Rel. HinkelNevada Supreme Court · 1971
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.