Legal Opinion

Attorney General ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Zantman Intracounty Drainage Board

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1969No. Docket No. 5,726PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to MCLA § 280.461 et seq. (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 11.1461 et seq.) the Zantman Intraeounty Drainage Board was created in Kalamazoo county. The board determined that the State *112highway commission’s share of the cost of the drain was 20% and ascertained the assessment at that figure. The State highway commission appealed to the circuit court for Kalamazoo county, which after a full hearing affirmed the drainage board’s determination. The State highway commission appeals to this Court and raises the single question: was the 20% drain assessment determined by the drainage board as the State…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Newport Mining Co. v. City of IronwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Blades v. Genesee County Drain DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In Re Petition of MacOmb Cty. Drain Com'rMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Lowrie & Robinson Lumber Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eyde v. Lansing TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Eyde v. Lansing TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API