Legal Opinion · Dissent

Blades v. Genesee County Drain District

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1965No. 2; Calendar 63, Docket 50,540PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1DissentDethmers, J.

Plaintiffs filed their complaint in the Genesee county circuit court, asking that the establishment of a special assessment district and assessment roll be set aside. They appeal from entry of summary judgment for defendants.

The Genesee county drain district No. 2 covers most of the northwesterly quarter of Genesee county. Plaintiffs are members of a class of upwards of 375 landowners in that district, mostly farmers, with large parcels of land. Proceedings for creation of the district were instituted in June, 1959, under the drain code of 1956, PA 1956, No 40 (CLS 1961, § 280.1 et seq. as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. HENDERSON BRIDGE COMPANY v. Henderson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Dane v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Fluckey v. City of PlymouthMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Elba Township v. Gratiot County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Dixon Road Group v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Edros Corp. v. City of Port HuronMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Eyde v. Lansing TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Cloverlanes Bowl, Inc v. GordonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API