Legal Opinion
Radium Remedies Co. v. Weiss
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 6, 1928No. 26,422PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Olsen, C.
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment. The action is brought to enjoin defendants from using a formula for a certain medicinal remedy, from continuing the manufacture, sale and advertising of such remedy, from continuing certain alleged unfair trade practices, and for damages. Plaintiff was granted a small part of the relief asked for, but was denied relief as to the more important measures.
It appears that on or about May 29, 1923, one J. A. McGlynn purchased from one J. H. Frank Smokey, who claimed to be the originator and sole owner thereof, a formula for the preparation of a remedy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vulcan Detinning Co. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
- Pillsbury-Washburn Flour Mills Co. v. EagleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
- Vulcan Detinning Co. v. American Can Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904
- Chamber of Commerce v. WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
3Cited by9 opinions
- Electro-Craft Corp. v. Controlled Motion, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Aktiebolaget Bofors v. United States (Two Cases). Aktiebolaget Bofors v. Acheson, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Jostens, Inc. v. National Computer System, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Venn v. GoedertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.